This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Catalogue
Master Index
Data
Centre
X
Find Data By Variable Find Data By Site, Facility, or Deployable Show Near-realtime Telemetry (7 day)
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Create a New Record Record List Alias List Editor
Edit Data Centre
Data Types
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information Download
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Lundquist, J., M. Hughes, E. Gutmann, and S. Kapnick
Title
Our Skill in Modeling Mountain Rain and Snow is Bypassing the Skill of Our Observational Networks
Year
2019
Publication Outlet
Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100, 2473–2490
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0001.1
Citation
Lundquist, J., M. Hughes, E. Gutmann, and S. Kapnick, 2019: Our Skill in Modeling Mountain Rain and Snow is Bypassing the Skill of Our Observational Networks. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100, 2473–2490, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0001.1 .
Abstract
In mountain terrain, well-configured high-resolution atmospheric models are able to simulate total annual rain and snowfall better than spatial estimates derived from in situ observational networks of precipitation gauges, and significantly better than radar or satellite-derived estimates. This conclusion is primarily based on comparisons with streamflow and snow in basins across the western United States and in Iceland, Europe, and Asia. Even though they outperform gridded datasets based on gauge networks, atmospheric models still disagree with each other on annual average precipitation and often disagree more on their representation of individual storms. Research to address these difficulties must make use of a wide range of observations (snow, streamflow, ecology, radar, satellite) and bring together scientists from different disciplines and a wide range of communities.
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
INARCH: International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Project Affiliations
INARCH1: International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Phase 1)
Publication Stage
Published
Additional Information
INARCH
Download Links
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0001.1
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-09-12
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2021-11-12-V1QJKbvAluUifrRynPAFEdw Publication 1.0