This site requires Cookies enabled in your browser for login.
Updating ...
WaterNet Home
WaterNet
for
pour le
Canada
Menu
WaterNet
Home
GWFO
Home
Master
List
Data
Centre
Collections
X
Defaults
Select All
Websites
X
Global Water Futures Observatories (GWFO) Global Water Futures (GWF) Global Institute for Water Security (GIWS) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology
Legacy Research Programs
X
Changing Cold Regions Network (CCRN) Drought Research Initiative (DRI) International Network of Alpine Research Catchment Hydrology (Legacy Site) Improving Processes & Parameterization for Prediction in Cold Regions Hydrology (IP3) The Mackenzie Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Study (MAGS)
Legacy sites
Map
Utilities
X
Account Settings Metadata Editor Record List Alias List Editor
Data Centre
Data Type Editor
. . .
X
Clear
Select All
Advanced Search
Go to Top⇡
Related items loading ...
Fetching Chart ...
Publication Additional Information Download
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Holmes, T., Stadnyk, T. A., Kim, S. J., & Asadzadeh, M.
Title
Regional Calibration With Isotope Tracers Using a Spatially Distributed Model: A Comparison of Methods
Year
2020
Publication Outlet
Water Resources Research, 56(9), e2020WR027447.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027447
Citation
Holmes, T., Stadnyk, T. A., Kim, S. J., & Asadzadeh, M. (2020). Regional Calibration With Isotope Tracers Using a Spatially Distributed Model: A Comparison of Methods. Water Resources Research, 56(9), e2020WR027447. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027447
Abstract
Accurate representation of flow sources in process-based hydrologic models remains challenging for remote, data-scarce regions. This study applies stable isotope tracers (18O and 2H) in water as auxiliary data for the calibration of the isoWATFLOOD™ model. The most efficient method of those evaluated for introducing isotope data into model calibration was the PA-DDS multiobjective search algorithm. The compromise solutions incorporating isotope data performed slightly inferior in terms of streamflow simulation compared to the calibrated solution using streamflow data only. However, the former solution outperformed the latter one in terms of isotope simulation. Approximation of the model parameter uncertainty into internal flow path partitioning was explored. Inclusion of isotope error facilitated a broader examination of the total parameter space, resulting in significant differences in internal storage and flow paths, most significantly for soil storage and evapotranspiration loss. Isotope-optimized calibration reduced evaporation rates and increased soil moisture content within the model, impacting soil water velocity but not streamflow celerity. Flow-only calibration resulted in artificially narrow model prediction bounds, significantly underestimating the propagation of parameter uncertainty, while isotope-informed calibrations yielded more reliable and robust bound on model predictions. Our findings demonstrate that the accuracy of a complex, spatially distributed, and process-based model cannot be judged from one summative flow-based model performance evaluation metric alone.
Program Affiliations
GWF: Global Water Futures
Project Affiliations
GWF-DMHMU: Diagnosing and Mitigating Hydrologic Model Uncertainty in High-Latitude Canadian Watersheds
Publication Stage
Published
Additional Information
Diagnosing and Mitigating Hydrologic Model
Download Links
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027447
© 2026 - WaterNet Version 2026-06-28
Global Water Futures Observatories
Powered by
G W F Net
T-2021-11-14-J1LtboQ2WJ2UW28OJ1zzkkINg Publication 1.0