
Related items loading ...
             
            
                    Section 1: Publication
                                
                Publication Type
                Journal Article
                                
                Authorship
                Holmes, T., Stadnyk, T. A., Kim, S. J., & Asadzadeh, M. 
                                
                Title
                Regional Calibration With Isotope Tracers Using a Spatially Distributed Model: A Comparison of Methods
                                
                Year
                2020
                                
                Publication Outlet
                Water Resources Research, 56(9), e2020WR027447. 
                                
                DOI
                
                                
                ISBN
                
                                
                ISSN
                
                                
                Citation
                
                    Holmes, T., Stadnyk, T. A., Kim, S. J., & Asadzadeh, M. (2020). Regional Calibration With Isotope Tracers Using a Spatially Distributed Model: A Comparison of Methods. Water Resources Research, 56(9), e2020WR027447. 
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027447
                Abstract
                
                    Accurate representation of flow sources in process-based hydrologic models remains challenging for remote, data-scarce regions. This study applies stable isotope tracers (18O and 2H) in water as auxiliary data for the calibration of the isoWATFLOOD™ model. The most efficient method of those evaluated for introducing isotope data into model calibration was the PA-DDS multiobjective search algorithm. The compromise solutions incorporating isotope data performed slightly inferior in terms of streamflow simulation compared to the calibrated solution using streamflow data only. However, the former solution outperformed the latter one in terms of isotope simulation. Approximation of the model parameter uncertainty into internal flow path partitioning was explored. Inclusion of isotope error facilitated a broader examination of the total parameter space, resulting in significant differences in internal storage and flow paths, most significantly for soil storage and evapotranspiration loss. Isotope-optimized calibration reduced evaporation rates and increased soil moisture content within the model, impacting soil water velocity but not streamflow celerity. Flow-only calibration resulted in artificially narrow model prediction bounds, significantly underestimating the propagation of parameter uncertainty, while isotope-informed calibrations yielded more reliable and robust bound on model predictions. Our findings demonstrate that the accuracy of a complex, spatially distributed, and process-based model cannot be judged from one summative flow-based model performance evaluation metric alone.
                
                                
                Plain Language Summary
                
                    
                
                 
                
                    Section 2: Additional Information
                                
    
        Program Affiliations
            
                                
    
        Project Affiliations
            
                                
    Submitters
            
                                
                Publication Stage
                Published
                                
                Theme
                
                                
                Presentation Format
                
                                
                Additional Information
                
                    Diagnosing and Mitigating Hydrologic Model