data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd75f/bd75fabd3f1b78a70ea259412407915f860a63e2" alt="Loading ..."
Related items loading ...
Section 1: Publication
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Ferguson, G., Cuthbert, M. O., Befus, K., Gleeson, T., & McIntosh, J. C.
Title
Rethinking groundwater age
Year
2020
Publication Outlet
Nature Geoscience, 13(9), 592-594.
DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Citation
Ferguson, G., Cuthbert, M. O., Befus, K., Gleeson, T., & McIntosh, J. C. (2020). Rethinking groundwater age. Nature Geoscience, 13(9), 592-594.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0629-7
Abstract
It is commonly thought that old groundwater cannot be pumped sustainably, and that recently recharged groundwater is inherently sustainable. We argue that both old and young groundwaters can be used in physically sustainable or unsustainable ways.
The idea that old or ‘fossil’ groundwater with long residence times is a non-renewable resource is found in scientific literature about groundwater sustainability1,2,3,4 and in media coverage of groundwater issues on a regional to global scale. However, we argue that groundwater residence times and ages are not metrics that can directly define groundwater sustainability. Instead, quantifying the distribution of groundwater ages in an aquifer can improve our understanding of aquifer systems and in turn indirectly inform sustainable groundwater use. Dispelling the myth that groundwater sustainability depends on its age is important for tackling groundwater depletion problems around the world5. Here we discuss what groundwater age and residence time can and cannot tell us about the functioning of past and present groundwater systems, and their sustainability.
Plain Language Summary