data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd75f/bd75fabd3f1b78a70ea259412407915f860a63e2" alt="Loading ..."
Related items loading ...
Section 1: Publication
Publication Type
Journal Article
Authorship
Wilkinson, S. L., Moore, P. A., Thompson, D. K., Wotton, B. M., Hvenegaard, S., Schroeder, D., & Waddington, J. M.
Title
The effects of black spruce fuel management on surface fuel condition and peat burn severity in an experimental fire
Year
2018
Publication Outlet
Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 48(12), 1433-1440
DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Citation
Wilkinson, S. L., Moore, P. A., Thompson, D. K., Wotton, B. M., Hvenegaard, S., Schroeder, D., & Waddington, J. M. (2018). The effects of black spruce fuel management on surface fuel condition and peat burn severity in an experimental fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 48(12), 1433-1440.
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0217
Abstract
In the boreal plains ecozone, black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) Britton, Sterns & Poggenb.) peatlands can represent large parts of the expanding wildland–urban interface (WUI) and wildland–industry interface (WII). The boreal plains wildfire regime is predicted to increase in areal extent and intensity, amplifying the need for wildfire management to protect the WUI and WII. Forested peatland ecosystems can burn at high intensity and present challenges for wildfire managers such as severe smouldering combustion and large carbon loss. Fuel management techniques such as mulching treatments (converting surface and canopy fuel to a masticated fuelbed) can be applied to black spruce peatlands, yet the impact on fuel load, condition, and peat burn severity is unclear. Using observations from an experimental fire, we found that a mulch-thinning fuel treatment could reduce peat depth of burn. However, where peat bulk density was increased by compaction, this led to an increased peat combustion carbon loss relative to the control. Furthermore, near-total combustion of the mulch layer resulted in significantly more surface fuel carbon emission from thinned and stripped fuel-treated areas compared with the control. We argue that although fuel treatment may benefit smouldering combustion suppression efforts, surface fuel carbon loss should be considered before treatments are implemented on a large scale.
Plain Language Summary